Saturday, June 14, 2008

eDisappointment.com


I made the very big mistake of joining eHarmony.com....

Now, I'd heard from a friend that a friend of hers had met someone thru the service and they were about to get married. So, I figured "what the heck. Let me give it a shot."

The form takes forever to fill out. Many of the questions are black-and-white answers, with very little wiggle-room for the gray areas of life (or at least my gray-area thinking.)

And, sure, I've been getting matches--basically from every state east of the Mississippi. I'm always stunned when my latest crop of six matches comes from Michigan, Kentucky, Tennesee, somewhere in New York State, and Ohio. A smattering of guys from Connecticut and Massachusetts, but not many. And few even come by and take a look. Maybe it's me. Maybe I'm not serious enough for them, or maybe many of them are looking for a woman with children. Or they want someone who's got an executive-level job who will help them pay their alimony.

Lord knows what goes thru the minds of single middle-aged men!

Aside from the matching me with anybody east of the Mississippi, there's also the extra services and the renewal. I (unfortunately wasted my money on) signed up for a three-month membership, which will (also unfortunately) get automatically renewed unless I perform the secret internet handshake so that they don't automatically renew me again.

Opting out of the renewal process shouldn't be hidden. It should be out, clear, in the open. I shouldn't feel like I'm being tricked into renewing.

Oh, and that doesn't take into account the very cold rejection responses, such as "I feel we have no chemistry" or "other." Now, "other" is neutral enough--but it's still kind of weird. When I receive the "I feel the physical distance between us is too great" from someone in North Carolina or Indiana or anywhere out of Mass, I'm not disappointed. That makes great sense.....

And when I *do* hear from someone half a continent away, I begin to both wonder, and feel like a mail-order bride. One match seems like a very nice guy, and I honestly wouldn't mind meeting him--but he's in Kentucky. Would be kind of hard to go out on a date, don't you think?

That's another thing: I don't get from this site that anyone's interested in just casually dating. It feels more like it's deadly serious, that the people are looking for that person they'll be matched with; that they'll exchange some email and phone calls, have that long distance "courting" thing, maybe a few fly-in visits and then bam! It's load the UHaul and haul ass across the country to the love of your life!

I'm not so sure about that.

I've always been concerned about the whole static nature of internet meeting anyway. We are often more than just a few carefully chosen words and a photograph on a screen. The men I've always had fantastic chemistry and great sex with, and even get along with, have always been those tall thin athletic types. Can't tell you why, but it's been that way consistently throughout my life. And those are the kind of guys that, if given a photo and a few words, will consistently pass me by....

Oh, and then there's the way in which you communicate on eHarmony. It's a series of rather stilted, "guided" email. I'm sorry, but for someone like me, who's a constant and experienced internet communicator, it's old-fashioned and annoying....

Not to mention that most men still don't like it when the woman is the first to communicate with them. That is, unless she looks like a model. Then, of course they don't mind....that's like some sort of Fairy Queen anointing them or something....

I don't know--because I have no idea what goes through middle-aged men's minds.

There's also no way to find out what kind of music the guy likes, what his life is like, etc. You find out this "character" stuff that can be just as false as info on any other site. And, honestly, it's the kind of stuff that you'd find out about someone in a few dates anyway. However, when I look at the character questions, I make note of them--they *can* be good things to ask someone anyway, and they have honed in on the things I know I can't tolerate in another person.

But, overall, I'm disappointed in this whole thing--from the crazy out of state matches that make me feel like a mail-order bride, to the stilted communication, the cold canned rejection responses, and the complicated opt-out. As my friend Marvin's wont to say "You're unique. Uniqueness is tough to fit on a computer screen."

And I guess he's right. I am who I am. I'm not model-thin, and in a two-dimensional world, one isn't going to *get* me all that well.

Then again, maybe I've just hit a point where I'm too quirky and too weird and the things that youthful beauty covered up to one degree or another, are now "out there" and there's no hiding them. eek! When it feels like the world of men demands perfection, where does someone so imperfect as me go to meet someone?? If men can't get past my non-fashion-model middle-aged appearance, what am I to do?

But one thing I can do for myself. Dig out that opt-out and stop beating myself up. At least that's a start.

5 Comments:

Blogger agahran said...

Great post, Tish -- this is exactly why I'm skeptical about online dating services in general. It seems to me I'm already meeting plenty of interesting people (met some very cool ones in Boston at MIT last week), but I just need to find more ways to convey that I'm open to and interested in dating, and to make those kinds of connections. Seems like meeting people in person gives me a far richer context to decide whether I'd like to date them. (Let alone the fact that I'm polyamorous, and most people either don't know what that is or treat it as a bug, when in fact it's a feature.)

The trouble with dating services is that they compartmentalize the dating part of a potential connection from the rest of life, which skews it in a way that's unlikely to yield good results.

IME, of course.

- Amy Gahran

9:08 PM  
Blogger Tish Grier said...

Hi Amy! As we careen into middle age, it's really *really* really hard not just to convey that you're interested in someone--but it can be *knowing* whether or not that someone is single or married. Lots of married persons don't wear wedding rings, so we can indadvertently be flirting with someone who's *not* available. Unless they're available for an affair--and it that case, it won't do us much good....

It's easier when we're in our 20's, when it's pretty much "boys and girls together" and the worst you have to worry about is a jealous girlfriend.

and you're right about the compartmentalizing. Awhile back, I was watching that show on Bravo (or was it A&E?) with the matchmaker in Buffalo. She often told clients not to reveal too much about their past relationship experiences in the first meeting. The reason: revealing too much baggage too soon could squash a potential relationship.

Then the questions then to ask: when is it appropriate to reveal the "baggage"? Revealing baggage shatters illusions. So how long do we keep up the illusion? How long to we stay in our boxes? How long before we can become real? I sometimes wonder if the "smoke and mirrors" approach has something to do with the way men want things to be, IMO.

10:30 AM  
Blogger agahran said...

Personally, I think it's fine to flirt with someone without knowing whether they're "available." A flirtation is just a kind of compliment, after all -- not a proposition, or a promise. If the person turns out to be not interested or not available, that's fine. When I flirt, my honest intention is to offer a compliment and indicate interest.

However, IMHO going further (dating, sex, sharing intimacy) does require talking about availability for those sorts of connections.

It saddens me that so many people, especially in my age range (40s) are so focused on finding a committed exclusive or primary partner that they consider any other potential connections a "waste of time," or even somehow insulting. For instance, I was recently out salsa dancing with a single middle-aged female friend. She was delighted when a cute guy asked her to dance -- and then quite annoyed when she learned he was married. It was just a *dance*, not a date!

I understand what you say about illusions, and it seems to me that many common romantic social myths hinge on *not* really knowing much about someone's real life. IMHO, that kind of romance is a trap, because it sets everyone up for frustration and disappointment. Personally, I'd rather take the approach of meeting people in all kinds of situations for all kinds of reasons, getting to know them, and then choosing from that group whom to date. And I'm willing to make it known that I'm available -- albeit under unusual circumstances (poly and currently married).

That's just me, though. YMMV.

- Amyt

3:13 PM  
Blogger Tish Grier said...

The whole flirting thing--sometimes that depends on where you are. From a local friend, I heard that, at one particular bar, single women had to be *very* careful...

But you're right about us 40-somethings, where the idea of even a "casual date" is something of an anathema. I don't know...I always figured that "causal dating" was a way of getting to know a person, without any kind of promise of anything else...

And, IMO, "casual dating" is NOT synonymous with "casual sex"--well, not for me anyway.

It's like we're all massively neurotic, like we've lost the fun of meeting lots of different types and kinds of people (oh, and that's another thing--I can't believe how picky some men get. if 20-somethings think they have it hard now, they have *no* idea what they're in for after 40) Social patterns change when people are over 40, and it's just not that much fun.

9:10 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Have you thought about a personal ad? When you place the ad, you have all the control. You decide who you meet with and where. I only mention it because my mother, one of my best friends, and myself all met our spouses by placing a personal ad in the daily newspaper. Granted, I did meet a few strange men; but, most were very nice and one was perfect. We've been together 13 years and are about to celebrate our 10th wedding anniversary. Don't give up! I had two weeks of endless phone conversations with my husband before I agreed to meet him. By the time we met, both of us were pretty taken with each other. It helped alot to know him before I saw him.

4:30 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home